The Questionable Science of Chappie

What is the point of making something if it is only going to be destroyed? How far are we willing to go in our technological developments? Is artificial intelligence really a good idea? Will artificial intelligence pass human intelligence at some point in time? These are the questions that “Chappie” attempts to answer. Starring Dev Patel from Slumdog Millionaire, Hugh Jackman, and Sigourney Weaver, this movie follows the story of a stolen police droid in a futuristic world. The droid, Chappie, is given new programming that is essentially artificial intelligence. The droid starts off as a “baby” but learns at an accelerated speed. The artificial intelligence gives Chappie a “brain” which functions much like how a human brain would. Chappie has to learn about how the world works, so when the artificial intelligence program is first given to the droid, it is essentially at the level of a small child. This gift of AI was not where the film was faulty. Almost anything is possible in a futuristic world, especially if it stays within the bounds of modern science. However, “Chappie” made several jumps that were vastly unrealistic, even in a futuristic world. For one, can AI really be so successful? And is it even possible for AI to develop capabilities that surpass its creators? Shortly after the AI is given to Chappie, he becomes very capable of thinking for himself in a very human-like manner. In the end, Chappie even comes up with ideas on his own, independent of any of the humans that he interacted with, formulating his own science and using computers with a skill that is far above that of most normal people. The end of the movie was where any semblance of science and natural plot progression disintegrated. Somehow, Chappie manages to figure out how to completely transfer consciousness and map it onto computers. When one person is dying, they take that person’s consciousness and transfer it into a droid. This is a totally unrealistic jump, considering at the beginning of the movie they had just created true artificial intelligence capable of thinking and feeling for itself. To be able to totally transfer someone’s consciousness is a huge step to take. “Chappie” obviously brings up a lot of questions about our future with technology. It is very thought-provoking and brings up many valid points. However, the computing and science aspect is a little bit questionable. The special effects are really well done and the integration between humans and technology is very realistic. It does get violent at times, and some of the scenes are far more gory than they need to be. The movie questions whether or not we really want to live in a world where droids and humans interact side by side with comparable levels of intelligence.
Stars

Stars

User Rating: 4.45 ( 1 votes)
70

What is the point of making something if it is only going to be destroyed? How far are we willing to go in our technological developments? Is artificial intelligence really a good idea? Will artificial intelligence pass human intelligence at some point in time? These are the questions that “Chappie” attempts to answer. Starring Dev Patel from Slumdog Millionaire, Hugh Jackman, and Sigourney Weaver, this movie follows the story of a stolen police droid in a futuristic world. The droid, Chappie, is given new programming that is essentially artificial intelligence. The droid starts off as a “baby” but learns at an accelerated speed.

The artificial intelligence gives Chappie a “brain” which functions much like how a human brain would. Chappie has to learn about how the world works, so when the artificial intelligence program is first given to the droid, it is essentially at the level of a small child.

This gift of AI was not where the film was faulty. Almost anything is possible in a futuristic world, especially if it stays within the bounds of modern science. However, “Chappie” made several jumps that were vastly unrealistic, even in a futuristic world. For one, can AI really be so successful? And is it even possible for AI to develop capabilities that surpass its creators? Shortly after the AI is given to Chappie, he becomes very capable of thinking for himself in a very human-like manner. In the end, Chappie even comes up with ideas on his own, independent of any of the humans that he interacted with, formulating his own science and using computers with a skill that is far above that of most normal people.

The end of the movie was where any semblance of science and natural plot progression disintegrated. Somehow, Chappie manages to figure out how to completely transfer consciousness and map it onto computers. When one person is dying, they take that person’s consciousness and transfer it into a droid. This is a totally unrealistic jump, considering at the beginning of the movie they had just created true artificial intelligence capable of thinking and feeling for itself. To be able to totally transfer someone’s consciousness is a huge step to take.

“Chappie” obviously brings up a lot of questions about our future with technology. It is very thought-provoking and brings up many valid points. However, the computing and science aspect is a little bit questionable. The special effects are really well done and the integration between humans and technology is very realistic. It does get violent at times, and some of the scenes are far more gory than they need to be. The movie questions whether or not we really want to live in a world where droids and humans interact side by side with comparable levels of intelligence.


Erica Dettmer-Radtke

Erica Dettmer-Radtke is a junior at Mines. She is the Arts and Entertainment Editor and Executive Editor for The Oredigger. Erica is a Statistics major and she came to Mines from Boulder, CO. In her spare time, while not studying or writing for the paper, she enjoys reading, watching movies, and hiking.


'The Questionable Science of Chappie' has 1 comment

  1. April 27, 2015 @ 8:16 am morakdais

    An AI would advance at an exponential rate, given how fast computers can process data today. We are at the bridge where the “code” of the human brain may be deciphered, but the larger question would be is consciousness in the flesh or the “data”? So even if chappie could work out how to reverse engineer his code in relation to human thought, that “person” may only be a simulacrum. Also given that AI could only grow based on hardware, if it knew it’s own internal hardware and code then growth (in theory) would be almost limitless. An AI would also be able to multi-task internalized data processing very fast, as we can unconsciously (or conscious) work things out, add in the ability to do complex equations in seconds and who know what it could or couldn’t do.

    Reply


Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.

Copyright © 2016 The Oredigger Newspaper. All Rights Reserved.